From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
1:11-CV-01347 LJO BAM HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-CV-01347 LJO BAM HC

10-25-2011

VIDAL DANNY GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. A. HEDGPETH, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO SUBMIT SIGNED DECLARATION

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Upon a close examination of the petition submitted to the Court, the Court has discovered that the petition does not contain an original signature. Local Rule 131 requires a document submitted to the Court for filing to include an original signature. In addition, Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires a petition for writ of habeas corpus to "be signed under penalty of perjury by the petitioner."

In light of the difficulty in having Petitioner submit a new habeas corpus petition, Petitioner is ORDERED to submit a document stating that he submitted the instant petition to the Court and sign it under penalty of perjury. The document should contain an original signature. Petitioner is GRANTED twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order to comply with the Court's directive.

Petitioner is forewarned that failure to comply with a Court order will result in dismissal of the petition pursuant to Local Rule 110.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Hedgpeth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
1:11-CV-01347 LJO BAM HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Hedgpeth

Case Details

Full title:VIDAL DANNY GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. A. HEDGPETH, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

1:11-CV-01347 LJO BAM HC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)