From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Hatton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2018
NO. CV 17-3051-AB(E) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018)

Opinion

NO. CV 17-3051-AB(E)

03-29-2018

SAUL MARIO GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. S. HATTON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's "Motion for Evidentiary Hearing, etc." is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered denying and dismissing the First Amended Petition with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: March 29, 2018

/s/_________

ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Hatton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2018
NO. CV 17-3051-AB(E) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Hatton

Case Details

Full title:SAUL MARIO GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. S. HATTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2018

Citations

NO. CV 17-3051-AB(E) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2018)