From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Grand Transportation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 354 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted April 28, 1999

June 7, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Grand Transportation, Inc., and Yaakov Cohen appeal, and the defendants G.E. Capital Fleet Services, Jason C. Cryder, and PCI Energy Services separately appeal, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated June 19, 1998, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Steven R. Harris, New York, N.Y., for appellants Grand Transportation, Inc., and Yaakov Cohen, and Sonageri Fallon, LLC, Garden City, N.Y. (Melvin Burruss and James DeNorscia of counsel), for appellants G.E. Capital Fleet Services, Jason C. Cryder, and PCI Energy Services (one brief filed).

Ginarte, O'Dwyer, Winograd Laracuente, New York, N.Y. (George Schwarz of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., FRED T. SANTUCCI, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendants' respective motions are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants met their initial burden of demonstrating that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Thus, it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to come forward with sufficient admissible evidence to create an issue of fact ( see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956-957). Upon our review of the record, we find that the plaintiff failed to do so ( see, Attivissimo v. Kugler, 226 A.D.2d 658; Barrett v. Howland, 202 A.D.2d 383; Beckett v. Conte, 176 A.D.2d 774). Thus, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment ( see, Licari v. Elliot, 57 N.Y.2d 230).


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Grand Transportation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 354 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Grand Transportation, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS GONZALEZ, respondent, v. GRAND TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 354 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 577