From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 6, 2003
303 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92192

Decided and Entered: March 6, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Jimmy Gonzalez, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting assault on a staff member. The misbehavior report relates that petitioner was being escorted down a corridor when he became belligerent and struck a correction officer in the face with his closed fist. The reporting officer assisted in subduing petitioner who continued to kick and violently resist until, upon the arrival of additional officers, he was finally forced into mechanical restraints. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented at the disciplinary hearing. Documentary evidence in the form of the misbehavior report, the unusual incident report, the use of force report and the memoranda filed by the correction officers who witnessed the events in question was consistent with the hearing testimony given by the two officers who were directly involved in the incident (see Matter of Rushing v. Goord, 298 A.D.2d 782; Matter of Orr v. Selsky, 290 A.D.2d 768, 769). Petitioner's assertion that he was not the aggressor in this matter but was simply defending himself against an attack by correction officers presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Giles v. Selsky, 287 A.D.2d 829, 830). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner's assertions of hearing officer bias and the violation of his right to call witnesses, have been examined and found to be without merit (see Matter of Shaird v. Selsky, 268 A.D.2d 721).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 6, 2003
303 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JIMMY GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 6, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 331

Citing Cases

Pope v. Goord

The requisite substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented in the form of the misbehavior report,…