From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Elliott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 17, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-1524 (M.D. Pa. May. 17, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-1524

05-17-2012

JOSE MANUEL TORRE GONZALEZ, Plaintiff v. BRIAN ELLIOTT, et al., Defendants


ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. 50), to which no objections have been filed, and upon independent review of the record, the court finds no error in the R&R and concludes that the R&R should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Doc. 50) is adopted.
2. Pursuant to Magistrate Judge Carlson's recommendation, Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 40, 44) are granted.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

_________________________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Elliott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 17, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-1524 (M.D. Pa. May. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Elliott

Case Details

Full title:JOSE MANUEL TORRE GONZALEZ, Plaintiff v. BRIAN ELLIOTT, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 17, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:11-CV-1524 (M.D. Pa. May. 17, 2012)