From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Consumer Legal Grp.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division
Jan 19, 2024
No. EP-23-CV-187-KC (W.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2024)

Opinion

EP-23-CV-187-KC

01-19-2024

YAZMIN GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. CONSUMER LEGAL GROUP P.C., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On this day, the Court considered the above-captioned case. On November 14, 2023, the Court referred the Motion for Default Judgment (“Motion”), ECF No. 13, to United States Magistrate Judge Leon Schydlower pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) for proposed findings of fact and recommendations. Nov. 14, 2023, Text Order. On January 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 14, recommending that the Court deny the Motion and grant Plaintiff “thirty days to revise and refile her motion with the admonition that failure to do so may result in the dismissal of the lawsuit.” R&R 2.

Parties have fourteen days from service of a Report and Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge to file written objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Over fourteen days have elapsed since Plaintiff was served with the R&R, and Defendant has not appeared in this case. No objections have been filed.

Federal district courts conduct de novo review of those portions of a report and recommendation to which a party has objected. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (“A judge . . . shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made ....”).

When parties do not file written objections, courts apply a “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law” standard of review to a report and recommendation. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989). After reviewing the R&R, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and finds that they are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See id.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R, ECF No. 14, in its entirety, and ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 13, is DENIED without prejudice to refiling on or before February 19, 2024 . Failure to timely refile may result in dismissal of the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Consumer Legal Grp.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division
Jan 19, 2024
No. EP-23-CV-187-KC (W.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Consumer Legal Grp.

Case Details

Full title:YAZMIN GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. CONSUMER LEGAL GROUP P.C., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division

Date published: Jan 19, 2024

Citations

No. EP-23-CV-187-KC (W.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2024)