From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 2, 2024
No. 4636-23S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

4636-23S

01-02-2024

LILIANA GONZALEZ, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER PETR(S) TO SHOW CAUSE WHY "S" SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.

The petition commencing the above-docketed matter was filed on April 1, 2023. In that document, petitioner elected to have this deficiency case conducted under the small tax case procedures. However, a review of the record shows that the amount in dispute for one or more taxable years exceeds $50,000. The small tax case procedures are only applicable to deficiency cases in which the amount in dispute for each taxable year is $50,000 or less. See section 7463(a)(1), Internal Revenue Code; Rules 170 and 171, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Upon due consideration and for cause, it is

ORDERED that, on or before February 1, 2024, petitioner shall show cause in writing why the Court should not issue an Order directing that the small tax case designation be removed in this case and the proceedings not be conducted under the Small Tax Case Rules.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 2, 2024
No. 4636-23S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:LILIANA GONZALEZ, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

No. 4636-23S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 2, 2024)