From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Chao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 21, 2021
Case No.: 20-cv-530-GPC-JLB (S.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2021)

Opinion

Case No.: 20-cv-530-GPC-JLB

01-21-2021

ANGELICA GRACIA GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary Department of Transportation, Defendant.


ORDER:

(1) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO EFFECT SERVICE; AND

(2) SETTING STATUS HEARING

[ECF No. 9]

On January 12, 2021, Plaintiff filed nunc pro tunc a response letter to this Court's Order to Show Cause. ECF No. 9. The response letter expressed Plaintiff's difficulties in effecting service. See id.

Construing the pro se Plaintiff's response liberally, see Bernhardt v. Los Angeles Cty., 339 F.3d 920, 925 (9th Cir. 2003), the Court constructs Plaintiff's plea as needing assistance from the U.S. Marshal to effect service. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (discussing the service process for proceedings in forma pauperis). The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request for U.S. Marshal service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3).

Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to re-issue a summons as to Plaintiff's Complaint upon Defendant, and provide Plaintiff with the "IFP Package," consisting of the following:

1. The re-issued Summons;

2. A certified copy of this Order;

3. A certified copy of the Court's Order granting Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 5;

4. A certified copy of the Complaint; and

5. A blank U.S. Marshal Form 285.

Plaintiff shall complete the U.S. Marshal Form 285, and forward the Form 285 along with the rest of the IFP Package to the U.S. Marshal. The Court reminds Plaintiff that plaintiffs must comply with the special requirements outlined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) for serving the United States and its agencies, officers, or employees.

Upon receipt of the IFP Package, the U.S. Marshal is ORDERED to serve a copy of the Complaint and re-issued Summons upon the Defendant as directed by Plaintiff on the complete U.S. Marshal Form 285. All costs of service will be advanced by the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3). In addition, for good cause appearing, the Court EXTENDS the time for effecting service for 45 days, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a telephonic status hearing be set on March 12, 2021 at 1:00 PM for briefing on Plaintiff's prosecution of the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 21, 2021

/s/_________

Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Chao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 21, 2021
Case No.: 20-cv-530-GPC-JLB (S.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Chao

Case Details

Full title:ANGELICA GRACIA GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 21, 2021

Citations

Case No.: 20-cv-530-GPC-JLB (S.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2021)