From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Aug 19, 2024
No. CV-24-00352-TUC-JR (D. Ariz. Aug. 19, 2024)

Opinion

CV-24-00352-TUC-JR

08-19-2024

Andy Gonzalez, Plaintiff, v. Bank of America, Defendant.


ORDER

Raner C. Collins, Senior United States District Judge

On July 30, 2024, Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in the above captioned matter pursuant to General Order 2125. (Doc. 6.) Judge Rateau recommended this Court grant pro se Plaintiff Andy Gonzalez's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) and dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with leave to amend (Doc. 1). (Doc. 6 at 4-5.) Judge Rateau notified Plaintiff that he had fourteen days to file written objections. (Id. at 5.) Plaintiff did not file any objection and the time to do so has now expired. On August 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Doc. 8.) The Court has reviewed the Motion to Appoint Counsel to determine if it contains objections to the R&R. It does not and, therefore, the Court will not construe it as a written objection.

If neither party objects to a Magistrate Judge's R&R, the District Court is not required to review the recommendation under any specified standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). However, the statute for review of a Magistrate Judge's recommendation "does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard." Id. at 154.

The Court has reviewed the Complaint (Doc. 1), Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2), Judge Rateau's R&R (Doc. 6), and Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 8). The Court finds that Judge Rateau's conclusions are thorough and well-reasoned. Plaintiff qualifies for in forma pauperis status, but his conclusory allegations fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court will, therefore, deny as moot Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint remedying the deficiencies outlined in the R&R within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Magistrate Judge Rateau's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (Doc. 6.)

(2) Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. (Doc. 2.)

(3) Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the deadline, the Clerk of Court shall close the case.

(4) Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. (Doc. 8.).


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Aug 19, 2024
No. CV-24-00352-TUC-JR (D. Ariz. Aug. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:Andy Gonzalez, Plaintiff, v. Bank of America, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Aug 19, 2024

Citations

No. CV-24-00352-TUC-JR (D. Ariz. Aug. 19, 2024)