Opinion
Civil No. 09-1100(SEC).
June 3, 2009
OPINION ORDER
On February 2, 2009, Plaintiff, a pro-se prisoner, filed the present claim against various Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Corrections Administration and State Insurance Fund officials (collectively "Defendants"). See Docket # 2. Concurrently, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Docket # 1. The present claim was filed in the Spanish language in violation of Local Rule 10(b). Accordingly, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a certified English translation, or otherwise show cause as to his defective filings. See Dockets ## 4 5. Plaintiff failed to respond to this Court's order, or seek an extension of time. For the reasons set forth below, the present action shall be DISMISSED.
The dismissal of a case is within the power of a district court. Of Course, dismissal is typically a measure of last resort, "reserved for extreme cases . . ." Torres-Vargas v. Pereira, 431 F.3d 389, 393 (1st Cir. 2005). However, First Circuit precedent is clear that when "the Court appropriately forewarns a plaintiff of the consequences of future non-compliance with an unambiguous order, the Court need not exhaust less toxic sanctions before dismissing a case with prejudice." Torres-Vargas, 431 F. 3d at 392. However, "[t]he power of the court to prevent undue delays must be weighed against the policy favoring the disposition of cases on their merits . . . [u]ltimately, however, plaintiff is responsible for developing and prosecuting its own case." Jardines Ltd. Pshp. v. Executive Homesearch Realty Servs., 178 F.R.D. 365, 367 (D.P.R. 1998); Hernandez-Festa v. Fernandez-Cornier, Civ. No.-5-1940, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59254 (D.P.R. Aug. 13, 2007).
Federal law dictates that all "[a]ll pleadings and proceedings in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico shall be conducted in the English language." Puerto Ricans for P.R. Party v. Dalmau, 544 F.3d 58, 67 (1st Cir. 2008). Violations of this rule constitute reversible error. Id. Local Rule 10(b) also stipulates that any filings not in the English language should be accompanied by a certified translation.
In the present action, this Court has attempted to forewarn Plaintiff regarding the deficiencies in his filings. Over the course of more than four months, he failed to comply with this Court's Order, or show cause as to his incompliance. Accordingly, considering Plaintiff's lack of compliance with Local Rule 10(b), and his inaction regarding the show cause order, all claims against Defendants will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judgment will be entered accordingly.