From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jan 5, 2018
NO. 03-17-00511-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 03-17-00511-CR

01-05-2018

Brandon Rene Gonzales, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. B-09-0247-SA , HONORABLE BEN WOODWARD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brandon Rene Gonzales appeals the revocation of his deferred adjudication community supervision and adjudication of guilt for engaging in organized criminal activity involving burglary of a building. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 30.02, 71.02(a). At a hearing on the motion to adjudicate, Gonzales pleaded "true" to the allegations in subparagraphs 2, 3, and 5 of paragraph III in the motion to revoke and "not true" to subparagraphs 1, 4, and 6. The district court found that all allegations in the motion to revoke were true and assessed punishment at five years' imprisonment. The court certified that Gonzales has the right of appeal.

Gonzales's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief addressing this appeal and concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record in this cause demonstrating why there are no arguable appellate grounds to be advanced. See id.; see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684, 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553, 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel sent a copy of the brief to Gonzales, advised him of his right to examine the appellate record in this cause and to file a pro se brief, and supplied Gonzales with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Gonzales did not file a pro se brief and did not request an extension of time to do so.

We have reviewed the record in this cause and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that this appeal is frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment adjudicating guilt is affirmed.

/s/_________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Goodwin Affirmed Filed: January 5, 2018 Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Gonzales v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jan 5, 2018
NO. 03-17-00511-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Gonzales v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brandon Rene Gonzales, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jan 5, 2018

Citations

NO. 03-17-00511-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 5, 2018)