From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Riley

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Sep 17, 2021
Civil Action 9:20cv131 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:20cv131

09-17-2021

ANDREW GONZALES v. PAUL REILLEY, ET AL.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Ron Clark Senior Judge

Plaintiff Andrew Gonzales, an inmate formerly at the Polunsky Unit, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled civil rights complaint.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge entered a Report recommending denying plaintiffs motion for temporary restraining order and for preliminary injunction (docket entry no. 14).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED. It is therefore

ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief is DENIED.

So ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Riley

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Sep 17, 2021
Civil Action 9:20cv131 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Riley

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW GONZALES v. PAUL REILLEY, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Sep 17, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 9:20cv131 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 17, 2021)