From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Macomber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 24, 2015
Case No. LA CV 15-00985-VBF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV 15-00985-VBF (JEM)

11-24-2015

JIMMY GONZALES, Petitioner, v. JEFF MACOMBER, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: November 24, 2015

/s/_________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Macomber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 24, 2015
Case No. LA CV 15-00985-VBF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Macomber

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY GONZALES, Petitioner, v. JEFF MACOMBER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

Citations

Case No. LA CV 15-00985-VBF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2015)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Nuniz

Although some of petitioner's allegations arguably raise the issue of equitable tolling, these allegations…

Davis v. C.C.I. Tehachapi Warden

ews v. California, 432 F.3d 1021, 1027-28 (9th Cir. 2005) (Petitioner was entitled to equitable tolling where…