From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Jax Auto.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 27, 2024
8:24-cv-01923-DOC-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-cv-01923-DOC-KES

11-27-2024

Ruben Paul Gonzales v. Jax Auto et al


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiffs counsel to submit a response in writing no later than December 4, 2024, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this CSC, on or before the above Dated:

X Answer to the complaint;

X Request for Entry of Default; or

X Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (F.R.Civ.P. 41)

It is plaintiffs responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiffs must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1.

Failure to respond by the date above will result in a Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution.


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Jax Auto.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 27, 2024
8:24-cv-01923-DOC-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Jax Auto.

Case Details

Full title:Ruben Paul Gonzales v. Jax Auto et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 27, 2024

Citations

8:24-cv-01923-DOC-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2024)