From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Indymac Bank FSB

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 12, 2010
Case No. 2:10-cv-2634 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-2634 MCE DAD PS.

November 12, 2010


ORDER


The pro se plaintiff in this mortgage loan foreclosure case has filed an ex parte application for leave to record a notice of lis pendens. Plaintiffs boilerplate application lacks support, and the allegations of plaintiffs complaint do not demonstrate that plaintiff is more likely than not to obtain a judgment against any defendant. See California Code of Civil Procedure § 405.21, Code Comment.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (Doc. No. 3) is denied.

DATED: November 11, 2010.


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Indymac Bank FSB

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 12, 2010
Case No. 2:10-cv-2634 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Indymac Bank FSB

Case Details

Full title:MARLENE GONZALES, Plaintiff, v. INDYMAC BANK, FSB, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 12, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-2634 MCE DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2010)