From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. China Station et al.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
SA CV 20-00412-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

SA CV 20-00412-DFM

01-31-2024

Ruben Paul Gonzales v. China Station et al.


Present The Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause

In February 2020, Plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act by Defendants China Station, China Station Restaurant Inc., and James Karubian. See Dkt. 1. In October 2020, Plaintiff dismissed the case after the parties settled. See Dkt. 16.

In November 2020, Plaintiff moved to reopen the case against Karubian on the ground that he did not send his portion of the settlement payment. See Dkt. 17. In December 2020, the Court granted Plaintiffs motion and allowed the case to proceed against Karubian. See Dkt. 20. Since then, no action has been taken.

It is Plaintiffs responsibility to move this case toward completion. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within seven (7) days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs filing of an application for default judgment or motion to dismiss this case is sufficient to discharge this order.


Summaries of

Gonzales v. China Station et al.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
SA CV 20-00412-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Gonzales v. China Station et al.

Case Details

Full title:Ruben Paul Gonzales v. China Station et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

SA CV 20-00412-DFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)