From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-03412 EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-03412 EFB

10-20-2011

BELVA GONZALES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, Bess M. Brewer (As authorized via email) BESS M. BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration ELIZABETH FIRER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

ELIZABETH FIRER

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER

The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court's approval as indicated by issuance of the attached Order, that Defendant shall have a FIRST extension of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment up to and including November 21 (day 30 falls on a Sunday).

This extension is being sought based on additional unexpected and unavoidable work of the undersigned counsel for the Commissioner between the time Plaintiff filed her Opening Brief and October 21, 2011 as well as major changes in the Commissioner's regional office directly impacting the undersigned counsel's responsibilities. Counsel is one of a few senior attorneys in the Commissioner's office responsible for analyzing cases for possible affirmative appeal. Due to the required concert with the Commissioner's headquarters and the United States Department of Justice, this work has extremely tight deadlines. The Commissioner's Regional office must hold conferences with senior staff and make its recommendation to headquarters within 48 hours of an adverse district court decision. In the time in question, four cases have come up for such review requiring the undersigned counsel to suspend everything and familiarize herself with a new case in significant depth.

Additionally, following the change in Chief Counsel in the Commissioner's regional office, major overhauls in the manner in which work is assigned, completed and reviewed are being instated and the undersigned has been asked to take on new roles, which have required immediate strategizing involving detailed meetings and coordination with people in earlier time zones. Finally, counsel was out of the office from October 6-11, 2011 on previously scheduled leave and had to complete a Ninth Circuit brief and review in the week following her return. Given this work load, the Commissioner respectfully requests 30 additional days in order to complete the Commissioner's response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Respectfully submitted,

Bess M. Brewer

(As authorized via email)

BESS M. BREWER

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

ELIZABETH FIRER

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-03412 EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BELVA GONZALES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:10-cv-03412 EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)