From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 17, 2009
No. 2:06-cv-00196-MCE-CHS-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2009)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-00196-MCE-CHS-P.

November 17, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus, has filed a motion for reconsideration of this court's order filed on September 30, 2009, which adopted in full the August 28, 2009 findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. The motion fails to demonstrate any new or different facts or circumstances which did not exist or were not previously shown. See E.D. Local Rule 78-230(k). Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration will be denied.

In the alternative, petitioner requests that a certificate of appealability issue so that he can appeal the court's decision. A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 "if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

In this case, a certificate of appealability shall not issue because petitioner failed to file a notice of appeal of the court's decision. The time for filing a timely notice of appeal has run and, at this point, may not be extended or reopened by this court. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5)-(6).

Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) Petitioner's motion for reconsideration is DENIED; and (2) Petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED.


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 17, 2009
No. 2:06-cv-00196-MCE-CHS-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED RUBEN GONZALES, Petitioner, v. DERRAL G. ADAMS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-00196-MCE-CHS-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2009)