From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales-Neyra v. I.N.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 15, 1997
133 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 1997)

Opinion

No. 96-70467

Argued and Submitted June 10, 1997 — San Francisco, California.

Filed September 15, 1997. Amended January 6, 1998.

COUNSEL

Randall Caudle, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner.

Marshall Tamor Golding, Ann V. Crowley, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

INS No. A72-124-436.

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Circuit Judges, and Evan J. Wallach, U.S. Court of International Trade Judge.


ORDER

The opinion filed on September 15, 1997 is amended as follows:

The sentence at page 12060, lines 9-13, which reads:

"Because we conclude that Gonzales-Neyra established past persecution on account of his political opinion, we also hold that he was entitled to a rebuttable presumption that he had a well-founded fear that he would be similarly persecuted in the future."

is replaced by:

"Regardless of whether Gonzales-Neyra established past persecution on account of his political opinion, he established a well-founded fear of future persecution."

The Petition for Rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Gonzales-Neyra v. I.N.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 15, 1997
133 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 1997)
Case details for

Gonzales-Neyra v. I.N.S.

Case Details

Full title:MARCO ANTONIO GONZALES-NEYRA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 15, 1997

Citations

133 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

Marku v. Ashcroft

Reply Br. at 20. It is true that a number of courts have held that opposition to government corruption can…