From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gong v. Penatta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2012
1:11cv02044 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2012)

Opinion

1:11cv02044 AWI DLB

02-01-2012

TERRY KUAN GONG, Plaintiff, v. LEON PENATTA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTIONS

(Document 20)


ORDER STRIKING "WITNESS

DECLARATION"

(Document 21)

On December 12, 2011, Plaintiff Terry Kuan Gong, appearing pro se, filed this employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Plaintiff paid the filing fee and the Clerk issued summonses on December 15, 2011.

On January 17, 2012, Plaintiff filed numerous motions related to discovery. The Court denied the motions on January 24, 2012, explaining:

Discovery is premature at this time, however, as there is no evidence of service. If and when Defendants are served, Plaintiff will work directly with Defendants to obtain discovery. Court permission is not necessary for discovery requests. Discovery is self-executing until such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the Court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Interrogatories, requests for admissions, requests for production of documents, and responses thereto shall not be filed with the Court until there is a proceeding in which the document or proof of service is at
issue. Such documents are to be served on the opposing party, and not with the Court. Discovery requests improperly filed with the Court shall be stricken from the record.

On January 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed another "Motion in Limine" requesting that numerous documents "be accepted into evidence." It is likely that Plaintiff filed this motion before receiving the Court's order on the prior motions. In any event, the motion is DENIED for the same reasons as set forth above.

Also on January 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed a "Witness Declaration." The declaration is unnecessary and need not be filed with the Court. Accordingly, Document 21 is STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gong v. Penatta

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 1, 2012
1:11cv02044 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Gong v. Penatta

Case Details

Full title:TERRY KUAN GONG, Plaintiff, v. LEON PENATTA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 1, 2012

Citations

1:11cv02044 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2012)