From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goney v. Suttonpark Capital LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 26, 2022
20 CIVIL 5387 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2022)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 5387 (AKH)

07-26-2022

RODNEY GONEY et al., Plaintiffs, v. SUTTONPARK CAPITAL LLC et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 22, 2022, Plaintiffs' failed plausibly to state a claim for relief against any of the Defendants, and to allow their proposed amendment would be futile. Thus, Defendants' motion to strike scandalous allegations and to seal the proposed FAC is academic and denied without prejudice. Judgment is entered for Defendants, dismissing the complaint against them with costs; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Goney v. Suttonpark Capital LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 26, 2022
20 CIVIL 5387 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Goney v. Suttonpark Capital LLC

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY GONEY et al., Plaintiffs, v. SUTTONPARK CAPITAL LLC et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 26, 2022

Citations

20 CIVIL 5387 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2022)