From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Pliler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2006
No. CIV S-03-2558 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-2558 DFL GGH P.

August 9, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 10, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 10, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss filed October 7, 2005, is denied; respondent is ordered to file an answer to the amended petition within thirty days of the filed date of this order.


Summaries of

Gomez v. Pliler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2006
No. CIV S-03-2558 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Gomez v. Pliler

Case Details

Full title:MARCO ALEXANDER GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. C.K. PLILER, et al., Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-2558 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)