Opinion
2:21-cv-01421-GMN-EJY
01-20-2022
GONZALO GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. OFFICE DEPOT, Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 4(m) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court
On August 13, 2021, Plaintiff Gonzalo Gomez (“Plaintiff) filed a Complaint against Defendant Office Depot (“Defendant”). (See Compl., ECF No. 4). On November 29, 2021, the Court warned Plaintiff that if he did not properly serve Defendant by December 29, 2021, the Court would enter an Order of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (See Notice, ECF No. 6). The deadline has now passed, no proper proof of service has been filed, and Plaintiff has failed to show good cause as to why the Court should not dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to effect timely service.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Office Depot.