From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Med. Center

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Sep 15, 2006
943 So. 2d 499 (La. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2005 CA 1916.

September 15, 2006.

Appeal from the office of Worker's Compensation Administration, District 5, No. 03-07597, Jason Ourso, J.

Denise A. Vinet, Baton Rouge, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Brenda M. Gomez.

Anthony P. Palermo, Matthew P. Bonham, Baton Rouge, for Defendant/Appellee, Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center.

Before: CARTER, C.J., WHIPPLE and McDONALD, JJ.


Brenda Gomez, the claimant in this workers' compensation proceeding, appeals a judgment sustaining a peremptory exception raising the objection of prescription and dismissing her claim for workers' compensation benefits. There is no dispute that Gomez's claim was prescribed on its face. The Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) found that Gomez did not prove that prescription was suspended or interrupted. Gomez appeals, contending the WCJ erred in this finding.

After thoroughly reviewing the record herein, we cannot say that the WCJ was clearly wrong in finding that Gomez did not meet her burden of proving that prescription was interrupted or suspended. Specifically, the record does not establish that Gomez was paid wages in lieu of compensation benefits or that she was lulled into a false sense of security. A reasonable factual basis exists for the WCJ's ruling; therefore, his findings cannot be manifestly erroneous.

The judgment of the Office of Workers' Compensation is affirmed in accordance with URCA Rule 2-16.1B. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Brenda Gomez.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Gomez v. Med. Center

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit
Sep 15, 2006
943 So. 2d 499 (La. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Gomez v. Med. Center

Case Details

Full title:Brenda M. GOMEZ v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit

Date published: Sep 15, 2006

Citations

943 So. 2d 499 (La. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Hernandez v. ASAP Emp't Serv., Inc.

The WCJ was not manifestly erroneous in finding Hernandez failed to prove an interruption or suspension of…

Hernandez v. ASAP Emp't Serv., Inc.

Having failed to satisfy his burden of proof, Hernandez's claim against CF Industries is prescribed. See La.…