From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2018
Case No. CV 17-04678 SJO (AFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 17-04678 SJO (AFM)

05-03-2018

EDGAR GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; (2) petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied; and (3) Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: May 3, 2018

/s/_________

S. JAMES OTERO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gomez v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 3, 2018
Case No. CV 17-04678 SJO (AFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Gomez v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR GOMEZ, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 3, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 17-04678 SJO (AFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 3, 2018)