From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. Holtz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 6, 2002
810 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-1801.

March 6, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Catherine M. Brunson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CL-00-11291-AH.

Roy D. Wasson, Miami, and Robert E. Gordon of Gordon Doner, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants.

Robert L. Teitler and Thomas J. Caldwell of Walton Lantaff Schroeder Carson, Miami, for appellee.


We reverse the final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee, Richard Holtz, the defendant in the circuit court. A person hitting a golf ball has a duty to exercise ordinary care, under the circumstances then surrounding him, for the safety of persons reasonably within the range of danger. See Miller v. Rollings, 56 So.2d 137, 138 (Fla. 1952). An issue of fact remains concerning whether the noise from the riding lawn mower was sufficient to place Holtz on notice that the mower driver was in the line of fire of the golf shot. See Jesters v. Taylor, 105 So.2d 569, 571 (Fla. 1958) (Roberts, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

STEVENSON, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gomez v. Holtz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 6, 2002
810 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Gomez v. Holtz

Case Details

Full title:ANDRES GOMEZ AND JUANA GOMEZ, Appellants, v. RICHARD HOLTZ, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 6, 2002

Citations

810 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)