From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GOMEZ v. EL SAID

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 4, 2011
1:11-cv-01124-LJO-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01124-LJO-SMS PC.

August 4, 2011


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL (ECF No. 11) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL


Trinidad Gomez ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) This action was filed on July 7, 2011. On August 2, 2011, Plaintiff filed a change of address and motion to voluntarily dismiss this action. (ECF No. 11.)

"[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(I), `a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.'"Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) ( quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). "[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can't complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it." Id. at 1078. This action is currently in the screening phase and no defendant has filed an answer or other responsive pleading.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

GOMEZ v. EL SAID

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 4, 2011
1:11-cv-01124-LJO-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)
Case details for

GOMEZ v. EL SAID

Case Details

Full title:TRINIDAD GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. KHALED EL SAID, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 4, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01124-LJO-SMS PC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2011)