Opinion
20168-21S
11-17-2022
ANTONIO GOMEZ, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Peter J. Panuthos Special Trial Judge
This case was called from the calendar for the Trial Session of the Court at San Francisco, California on November 7, 2022. Counsel for respondent appeared and was heard. During the trial session counsel for respondent orally moved for a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution.
Petitioner, Antonio Gomez, later appeared and was heard on the Trial Session calendar recall. Henry Cheng, filed a Limited Entry of Appearance on behalf of the petitioner. During the trial session recall, respondent announced that the parties have reached a tentative basis for settlement. Upon due consideration, and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Oral Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution is denied. It is further
ORDERED that the parties shall, on or before January 6, 2023, submit a stipulated decision document or file with the Court a status report advising as to the then present status of the case.