Opinion
2:21-cv-01423-GMN-VCF
11-18-2022
GONZALO GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. 7-11, et al, Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 4(m) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
On August 13, 2021, Plaintiff Gonzalo Gomez (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendants 7-11, Head Manager, and Team (“Defendants”). (See Compl., ECF No. 4). On September 27, 2022, the Court warned Plaintiff that if he did not properly serve Defendants by October 27, 2022, the Court would enter an Order of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (See Notice, ECF No. 6). The deadline to do so has now passed, no proper proof of service has been filed, and Plaintiff has failed to show good cause as to why the Court should not dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to effect timely service.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 4) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to close the case.