From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez-Arroyo v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 31, 2020
299 So. 3d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-361

07-31-2020

Rolando L. GOMEZ-ARROYO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Louis Angelo Rossi, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Louis Angelo Rossi, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence entered with one exception. The judgment incorrectly recites that the statute violated in Count 18 was section 934.21 rather than section 934.215. We remand for correction of this scrivener's error.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener's error.

EVANDER, C.J., EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).


Summaries of

Gomez-Arroyo v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 31, 2020
299 So. 3d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Gomez-Arroyo v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROLANDO L. GOMEZ-ARROYO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 31, 2020

Citations

299 So. 3d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)