From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golubchik v. Das Trading Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 2009
62 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 539.

May 12, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered November 20, 2008, which denied the motion of defendants New York City Ambulette and Arkady Neyshtat for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of said defendants dismissing the complaint as against them.

Smith Mazure Director Wilkins Young § Yagerman, P.C., New York (Alan C. Kelhoffer of counsel), for appellants.

Cheven, Keely § Hatzis, New York (William B. Stock of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.


Plaintiff, a passenger in an ambulette owned by New York City Ambulette and driven by Arkady Neyshtat, seeks damages from defendants for injuries sustained in an accident when the ambulette was hit from behind by a van owned by defendant Das Trading Corp. and driven by defendant Wei Pan.

A rear-end collision with a stopped vehicle establishes a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the operator of the moving vehicle ( see Mankiewicz v Excellent, 25 AD3d 591, 592; Johnson v Phillips, 261 AD2d 269, 271). Here, defendants New York City Ambulette and Neyshtat established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, by submitting evidence that Neyshtat was stopped in the left lane on the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway Defendant Pan fails to raise an issue of fact in rebuttal.


Summaries of

Golubchik v. Das Trading Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 2009
62 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Golubchik v. Das Trading Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LYUDMILA GOLUBCHIK, Plaintiff, v. DAS TRADING CORP. et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 480 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3783
879 N.Y.S.2d 408

Citing Cases

Rosario v. Adams

Here, defendant Santos has demonstrated that he was not at fault for causing the collision. See Golubchik v.…

Bah v. Benton

Here, defendants have presented prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. See Golubchik v. Das Trading…