From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goluback v. Almodo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1903
79 App. Div. 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)

Opinion

January Term, 1903.

Present — Goodrich, P.J., Bartlett, Woodward, Hirschberg and Jenks, JJ.


Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed on the ground that the remedy of the plaintiff is action for breach of contract and not upon negligence. (See Frank v. Mandel, 76 App. Div. 413, and Goldberg v. Besdine, Id. 451.)


Summaries of

Goluback v. Almodo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1903
79 App. Div. 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Case details for

Goluback v. Almodo

Case Details

Full title:Myron E. Goluback, Respondent, v. Gerardo D. Almodo, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1903

Citations

79 App. Div. 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)

Citing Cases

Boden v. Scholtz

The obligation being wholly contractual, no action in tort will lie for a violation of the agreement. (…