From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golsong v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 7, 2022
No. 37398-21S (U.S.T.C. Apr. 7, 2022)

Opinion

37398-21S

04-07-2022

WILLIAM B. GOLSONG & VIENNA M. GOLSONG, DECEASED, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

MAURICE B. FOLEY CHIEF JUDGE

On April 1, 2021, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Vienna M. Golsong, Deceased, on the ground that the petition as to Vienna M. Golsong, Deceased, was not executed or filed by a fiduciary or personal representative duly appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction and legally entitled to institute a case on behalf of Vienna M. Golsong, Deceased, or her estate, nor did William B. Golsong wish to seek appointment as a special administrator under California law. In the motion, respondent indicated that William B. Golsong has no objection to the granting thereof.

The burden of proving that the Court has jurisdiction is on the taxpayer, and unless the petition is filed by the taxpayer or someone lawfully authorized to act on his or her behalf, the Court lacks jurisdiction. Fehrs v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 346, 348 (1975).

The premises considered, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss For Lack of Jurisdiction as to Vienna M. Golsong, Deceased, and To Change Caption is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Vienna M. Golsong, Deceased. It is further

ORDERED that the caption of this case is amended to read "William B. Golsong, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent".


Summaries of

Golsong v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Apr 7, 2022
No. 37398-21S (U.S.T.C. Apr. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Golsong v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM B. GOLSONG & VIENNA M. GOLSONG, DECEASED, Petitioners v…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Apr 7, 2022

Citations

No. 37398-21S (U.S.T.C. Apr. 7, 2022)