Opinion
Argued December 15, 1890
Decided January 13, 1891
Brainard Tolles for appellant.
B.F. Watson for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except EARL, PECKHAM and GRAY, JJ., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Goll v. Manhattan Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 13, 1891
125 N.Y. 714 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Goll v. Manhattan Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 13, 1891
125 N.Y. 714 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Goll v. Manhattan Railway Co.
Case Details
Full title:FREDERICK GOLL, Respondent, v . THE MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 13, 1891
Citations
125 N.Y. 714 (N.Y. 1891)
Citing Cases
Volkmar v. M.R. Co.
ff was passing on a highway under a railroad bridge when a brick fell from one of the pilasters upon which an…
Keener v. SharpC.G. Shepard for appellants. (1) The water in Big Lake or Morris Lake as well as the overflow therefrom, is…