From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Golf City Prods. v. Aftershock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. C-11-03547CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C-11-03547CW

10-18-2011

GOLF CITY PRODUCTS et al. Plaintiff(s), v. AFTERSHOCK, et al., Defendant(s).


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:
[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[√] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

[] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) _______________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[√] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[] other requested deadline _______________

________

Attorney for Plaintiff

________

Attorney for Defendant
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation." [PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

[] Non-binding Arbitration
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[] Mediation
[×] Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

[×] 90 days from the date of this order.
[] other _______________
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
cc: ADR


Summaries of

Golf City Prods. v. Aftershock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. C-11-03547CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Golf City Prods. v. Aftershock

Case Details

Full title:GOLF CITY PRODUCTS et al. Plaintiff(s), v. AFTERSHOCK, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C-11-03547CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)