From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldwire v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 18, 2024
Civil Action 14-5935 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 14-5935

06-18-2024

KHALIF GOLDWIRE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILA. POLICE OFFICER JEFFREY WALKER, POLICE OFFICER BRIAN REYNOLDS, POLICE OFFICER THOMAS LICIARDELLO, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1


ORDER

KEARNEY, J.

AND NOW, this 18th day of June 2024, upon considering Defendant City of Philadelphia's Motion to enforce the settlement (ECF No. 32), no timely opposition, but finding we cannot assist the parties in overcoming the Plaintiff's seeming lack of cooperation as we lack subject matter jurisdiction after we granted the parties' request we dismiss Plaintiff's claims without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) without including the parties' contractual obligations in the dismissal Order (ECF No. 31) as necessary to retain subject matter jurisdiction over a contract dispute between Pennsylvania parties, and for reasons in today's accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion to enforce the settlement agreement (ECF No. 32) is DENIED as the case remains closed in this Court.


Summaries of

Goldwire v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 18, 2024
Civil Action 14-5935 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Goldwire v. City of Philadelphia

Case Details

Full title:KHALIF GOLDWIRE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILA. POLICE OFFICER JEFFREY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 18, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 14-5935 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 18, 2024)