From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldwater v. Fisch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 1941
261 App. Div. 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Summary

In Goldwater v. Fisch (supra, p. 227) the court held the plaintiff's attorney liable to the hospital for failure to pay its bill upon settlement of the claim and said: "When the proceeds of the settlement were paid over to defendant, as attorney for Charles Pugh, the equitable title of the city of New York for the amount of its claim ripened into a legal title and defendant, having full knowledge of the city's interest, was obligated to pay to the plaintiff the sum to which the city was entitled."

Summary of this case from Matter of Walton

Opinion

February 7, 1941.

Appeal from Supreme Court, First Department.

Abraham M. Fisch of counsel [ Sidney Schiffman, attorney, for the appellant.

Fred Iscol of counsel [ Paxton Blair with him on the brief; William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel], for the respondent.


When the proceeds of the settlement were paid over to defendant, as attorney for Charles Pugh, the equitable title of the city of New York for the amount of its claim ripened into a legal title and defendant, having full knowledge of the city's interest, was obligated to pay to the plaintiff the sum to which the city was entitled.

The amount of the judgment also appears to be sustained by the proof. The arguments advanced by defendant to the effect that Pugh was not liable to the city for surgical fees are similar to those considered in Matter of Kocko v. Harris Coal Co., Inc. ( 262 N.Y. 535). In that case the Court of Appeals held that such charges were proper.

The determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs.

MARTIN, P.J., O'MALLEY, TOWNLEY and COHN, JJ., concur; CALLAHAN, J., dissents, with memorandum.


I dissent and vote to modify the determination of the Appellate Term and the judgment of the City Court by striking from the judgment the charges for surgeons' fees amounting to $175, which were not paid by the city, and by reducing the judgment accordingly.

Determination affirmed, with costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Goldwater v. Fisch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 7, 1941
261 App. Div. 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

In Goldwater v. Fisch (supra, p. 227) the court held the plaintiff's attorney liable to the hospital for failure to pay its bill upon settlement of the claim and said: "When the proceeds of the settlement were paid over to defendant, as attorney for Charles Pugh, the equitable title of the city of New York for the amount of its claim ripened into a legal title and defendant, having full knowledge of the city's interest, was obligated to pay to the plaintiff the sum to which the city was entitled."

Summary of this case from Matter of Walton
Case details for

Goldwater v. Fisch

Case Details

Full title:SIGISMUND S. GOLDWATER, as Commissioner of Hospitals of the City of New…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
25 N.Y.S.2d 84

Citing Cases

Matter of Walton

In interpreting section 189 Lien of the Lien Law, the Appellate Division of this Department has held: "The…

Matter of Meyer v. New York Hosp

It is not a term which necessarily hangs on how much money the particular physician, biologist, pharmacist,…