Goldstein v. Shapiro

Full title: DONNA G. GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. DANIEL J. SHAPIRO, Appellant

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 17, 1994

208 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

618 N.Y.S.2d 535

Opinion

October 17, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the best remedy for the perceived inequities in the pendente lite award is a speedy trial at which the disputed issues as to the financial capacity and circumstances of the parties can be fully explored (see, Terceira v. Terceira, 193 A.D.2d 729; Mulcahy v. Mulcahy, 170 A.D.2d 587; Marohn v. Marohn, 157 A.D.2d 771). Thompson, J.P., Miller, O'Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.