From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Moran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 20, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV243 (E.D. Va. Jun. 20, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:17CV243

06-20-2017

DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN MORAN, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on May 24, 2017, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. On June 5, 2017, the United States Postal Service returned the May 24, 2017 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER" and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiff's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge Date: 6/20/17
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Moran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jun 20, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:17CV243 (E.D. Va. Jun. 20, 2017)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Moran

Case Details

Full title:DAVID S. GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN MORAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jun 20, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:17CV243 (E.D. Va. Jun. 20, 2017)