From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Kranz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

May, 1935.

Present — Hill, P.J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The plaintiff's action is for injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the construction of a dam. The defendants ask for the reformation of the instrument granting plaintiff's rights on the ground of scrivener's mistake and misrepresentation. Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and reformation ordered. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Kranz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Kranz

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER RUTH GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, v. LUES KRANZ and Another, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 861 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)