From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Hoagland

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 22, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51932 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Opinion

2004-1696 RO C.

Decided November 22, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Village of Chestnut Ridge, Rockland County (Joseph E. Suarez, J.), entered September 22, 2004. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the sum of $500.

Judgment unanimously reversed without costs and action dismissed.

PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., ANGIOLILLO and TANENBAUM, JJ.


Plaintiff commenced the instant action to recover the sum of $1,000 for unpaid services. Plaintiff, an attorney, testified that he entered into an oral retainer agreement with defendant for the sum of $2,500 to represent the defendant in a criminal action. In addition, defendant agreed to reimburse him an additional $1,000 if the matter went to trial. On the date of trial, defendant entered into a plea agreement. Thereafter, plaintiff billed defendant for the sum of $1,000. It is well settled that a retainer agreement between an attorney and client must be construed most favorably to the client ( see Shaw v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172). Therefore, since the criminal matter never went to trial ( see Vanek v. Spivak, 2002 NY Slip Op 50703[U] [App Term, 9th and 10th Jud Dists]), we are of the opinion that plaintiff was not entitled to recover an additional trial fee of $1,000 from defendant.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Hoagland

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 22, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51932 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Hoagland

Case Details

Full title:DAVID I. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ., Respondent, v. JAMES HOAGLAND, Appellant

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 22, 2005

Citations

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51932 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
809 N.Y.S.2d 481