From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

March, 1935.


The parties having agreed in open court that this appeal may be decided by a court of four justices, the decision is as follows: Order denying defendant's motion for a change of venue from the county of Rockland to the county of New York reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. This is a divorce action, the venue of which was laid in Rockland county. The plaintiff, at the time of the commencement of the action, was a resident of New York county and the defendant a resident of Queens county. Defendant moved to change the venue to New York county. Since the action should have been brought in the county of the residence of either of the parties to the action (Civ. Prac. Act, § 182), it was the right of the defendant to move for a change of venue to either the county of her residence or that of the plaintiff. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:SOL GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. HARRIET GOLDSTEIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Commercial State Bank Tr. Co. of N.Y. v. Ritz

lant was and is a resident of Genesee County. Respondent based its cross motion on the ground that the action…