From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

April, 1934.


Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to open plaintiff's default, to vacate order dismissing his complaint and to restore the case to the Trial Term calendar denied, with ten dollars costs. The granting of this motion was an abuse of discretion. The delay in bringing this case to trial is inexcusable. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Friedland

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. SOL FRIEDLAND and Others, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)