Opinion
20-23402-CIV-MARTINEZ-BECERRA
11-30-2022
LEON GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. OLEG FIRER, et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JOSE E. MARTINEZ, UNITED TATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Jacqueline Becerra, United States Magistrate Judge, for “a Report and Recommendation on all dispositive matters not consented to by the parties.” (ECF No. 39). Thereafter, Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”), (ECF No. 89). Hence, Magistrate Judge Becerra filed a Report and Recommendation, which recommended that this Court grant in part and deny in part the Motion. (ECF No. 111.) Plaintiff timely filed his objections to the Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 112.) Defendants did not file any objections and the time to do so has now passed.
This Court reviewed the entire file and record and made a de novo review of the Motion and issues that Plaintiffs objections to the Report and Recommendation present. This Court finds that the issues raised in Plaintiffs objections, (ECF No. 112), were already addressed in Magistrate Judge Becerra's Report and Recommendation, (ECFNo. Ill), or are without merit.
After careful consideration, it is
ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Becerra's Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. Ill), is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND
ADJUDGED that the Motion, (ECF No. 85), is GRANTED IN PART with regard to Counts I and II and DENIED IN PART with regard to Counts III and IV.