From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Barajas

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 24, 2022
22-cv-03277-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-03277-HSG

08-24-2022

DARRYL LEE GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. GEORGINA BARAJAS, et al., Defendants


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Plaintiff Darryl Lee Goldstein has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 17, 2022, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend because it failed to state a cognizable federal constitutional claim. Dkt. No. 3. Plaintiff was granted leave to amend the complaint to address the identified deficiency and ordered to file an amended complaint by July 15, 2022. Dkt. No. 3. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, and the deadline to do so has long since passed. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to file an amended complaint. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff, and close the case.

Any motion to reopen this action must be accompanied by a proposed amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Barajas

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 24, 2022
22-cv-03277-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Barajas

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL LEE GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. GEORGINA BARAJAS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

22-cv-03277-HSG (N.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2022)