From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldsmith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Jul 10, 2019
279 So. 3d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Nos. 4D18-3446 4D19-792

07-10-2019

Royce GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Royce Peter Goldsmith, Arcadia, pro se. No appearance required by appellee.


Royce Peter Goldsmith, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required by appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Brooks v. State , 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007) ("[F]or motions filed under rule 3.800(a), we hold that if the trial court could have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet, any error was harmless.").

Warner, Ciklin and Forst, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldsmith v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Jul 10, 2019
279 So. 3d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Goldsmith v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROYCE GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 10, 2019

Citations

279 So. 3d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)