From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldsmith v. Nangalma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2012
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02845 EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02845 EFB

01-30-2012

JAMES GOLDSMITH JR., Plaintiff, v. DR. A NANGALMA, Defendant,

Rivera & Associates Jesse M. Rivera, CSB #84259 Jonathan B. Paul, CSB #215884 Shanan L. Hewitt, CSB #200168 Kelly A. Yokley, CSB #192015 Attorneys for Defendant, A. Nangalma, M.D. Williams & Associates Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021 Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333 Leslie Wagley, CSB #215281 Attorneys for Defendant, Jian Ma, M.D. IN PRO PER James Goldsmith Jr., Plaintiff


Rivera & Associates

Jesse M. Rivera, CSB #84259

Jonathan B. Paul, CSB #215884

Shanan L. Hewitt, CSB #200168

Kelly A. Yokley, CSB #192015

Attorneys for Defendant,

A. Nangalma, M.D.

Williams & Associates

Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021

Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333

Leslie Wagley, CSB #215281

Attorneys for Defendant,

Jian Ma, M.D.

IN PRO PER

James Goldsmith Jr.,

Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONSOLIDATION OF CASES FOR ALL PURPOSES

COME NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and/or in pro per and subject to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the above-entitled action be consolidated with James K. Goldsmith v. Jian Ma, M.D., Case No. CIV 2:10-cv-1570 EFB, for all purposes, including trial.

The parties stipulated to consolidation of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) on the grounds that: (1) the cases involve common questions of fact and law; (2) consolidation will promote judicial efficiency, prevent duplicative discovery and motion practice and avoid inconsistent orders; and (3) consolidation will cause no demonstrable prejudice to the parties.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

RIVERA & ASSOCIATES

Jonathan B. Paul

JONATHAN B. PAUL

Attorney for Defendant

A. NANGALAMA, M.D.

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

Leslie Wagley

(As authorized on January 6, 2012)

____________________________

LESLIE WAGLEY

Attorney for Defendant

JIAN MA, M.D.

PLAINTIFF

James K. Goldsmith, Jr.

(As Authorized on December 6, 2011)

____________________________

JAMES K. GOLDSMITH, JR.

Plaintiff in Pro Per

Stipulation and Order for Consolidation of Cases

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Case No: 2:10-cv-2845 EFB is designated as the "master file";

2. The Clerk is directed to copy from Case No. 10-cv-1570 EFB, the complaint (Dckt. No.1), the answer (Dckt. No. 12), the pending motion for summary judgment (Dckt. No. 34), and any other pertinent documents, and to place those copies in the "master file";

3. The Clerk is directed to administratively close Case No. 10-cv-1570 EFB; and

4. The parties are directed to file all future pleadings ONLY in Case No: 2:10-cv-2845.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Goldsmith v. Nangalma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2012
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02845 EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Goldsmith v. Nangalma

Case Details

Full title:JAMES GOLDSMITH JR., Plaintiff, v. DR. A NANGALMA, Defendant,

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-02845 EFB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2012)