Goldsmith v. Garcia

Full title: James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith, Appellants, v. Pedro J. Garcia…

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Apr 10, 2024

No. 3D22-1692 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Apr. 10, 2024)

Opinion

3D22-1692

04-10-2024

James Goldsmith and Monica Goldsmith, Appellants, v. Pedro J. Garcia, etc., et al., Appellees.

Mark A. Goldstein, for appellants. Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Ryan Carlin, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee Pedro J. Garcia, as Property Appraiser of Miami-Dade County.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Lower Tribunal

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County No. 21-6, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge.

Mark A. Goldstein, for appellants.

Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Ryan Carlin, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee Pedro J. Garcia, as Property Appraiser of Miami-Dade County.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220, 226 (2006) ("Due process does not require that a property owner receive actual notice before the government may take his property."); Miles v. Parrish, 199 So.3d 1046, 1049 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) ("There is no requirement that the property appraiser give the property owner actual notice of the tax lien ....") (quoting Genesis Ministries, Inc. v. Brown, 186 So.3d 1074, 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)).