From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldsmith v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 9, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-1995 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1995 KJN P

09-09-2011

JAMES K. GOLDSMITH, Plaintiff, v. L. DAVIS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On August 22, 2011, this court directed defendant Davis to pay the U.S. Marshal the costs of personal service of summons, or to show cause why such costs should not be taxed. (Dkt. No. 25.) Defendant has now shown cause why such costs should not be taxed. (Dkt. No. 26.) Defendant correctly states that the U.S. Marshal, after initially requesting reimbursement (Dkt. No. 21), then withdrew the request (Dkt. No. 24). As set forth in the declaration of A. Brodbeck, filed by defendant, the U.S. Marshal initially sought reimbursement due to the temporary misplacement of defendant Davis' timely signed waiver of service. (Dkt. No. 26 at 6.)

Thereafter, the court misconstrued as duplicative the U.S. Marshal's request for reimbursement, and request to withdraw such request.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this court's order filed August 22, 2011 (Dkt. No. 25) is vacated.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Goldsmith v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 9, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-1995 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Goldsmith v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:JAMES K. GOLDSMITH, Plaintiff, v. L. DAVIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 9, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1995 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)