From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldschmidt v. Rudin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

May, 1931.


Order and judgment reversed upon the law, with costs to abide the event, and motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs. The complaint sufficiently alleges that the condition precedent with respect to the passing of title did not occur as a consequence of a fault of the defendant in refusing to make the conveyance. The applicability of Levy v. Forster ( 224 App. Div. 463) can be determined only upon the trial. Young, Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldschmidt v. Rudin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Goldschmidt v. Rudin

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN GOLDSCHMIDT, Appellant, v. JACOB RUDIN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1931

Citations

233 App. Div. 740 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)